Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Yaris 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Yaris 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 | Toyota Yaris 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱795,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 4115 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | 1070 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam Type |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Yaris 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
The Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (₱820,000) is the better choice for Filipino buyers prioritizing space and practicality, while the Toyota Yaris 1.3 E CVT (₱795,000) suits those who value lower cost and lighter handling. The APV offers a larger seating capacity (2+2+3 vs 2+3) and rear-wheel-drive stability, ideal for families needing cargo room. The Yaris’ 1.3-liter engine delivers slightly higher torque (123 Nm vs 127 Nm) and uses a CVT, which may improve fuel efficiency on mixed routes. Both models share a 100,000km/3-year warranty, but the APV’s higher price reflects superior practicality. Avoid choosing based on minor specs like valve train complexity, as the APV’s drivetrain and capacity make it more versatile for Filipino commutes.