Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 | Kia Picanto 1.2 AT (2018) Kia ₱696,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1248cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Natural aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 84 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 122 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 3595 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1595 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 1485 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2400 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | 913 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer + Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle + Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/55 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/55 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, space and performance, the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) and the Kia Picanto 1.2 AT (2018) serve very different needs. The APV costs ₱820,000, about ₱124,000 more than the Picanto, but it offers a larger body‑on‑frame MPV platform, 2+2+3 seating and a longer wheelbase (4,230 mm vs 3,595 mm). Its 1.6‑L inline‑4 produces 91 PS and 127 Nm, giving a modest power edge over the Picanto’s 84 PS and 122 Nm, while both share a 4‑speed automatic and a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. If you need to haul a family of seven, transport cargo, or prefer a rear‑wheel‑drive utility vehicle, the APV’s extra seats and higher torque are decisive, despite its discontinued status. Conversely, the Picanto is cheaper, lighter, front‑wheel‑drive and built on a unibody hatchback, making it more fuel‑efficient and easier to maneuver in city traffic. Its smaller footprint and lower price suit single drivers, couples or small families focused on daily commuting and parking convenience. Choose the APV for max practicality and passenger capacity; choose the Picanto for budget‑friendly urban use.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Kia Picanto 1.2 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱696,000, compared to the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) priced at ₱820,000.
Which vehicle offers more power?
The Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT produces 91 PS, slightly more than the Kia Picanto’s 84 PS.
Which car is better for city commuting?
The Kia Picanto’s smaller length (3,595 mm), front‑wheel‑drive layout and lower price make it better suited for tight city streets and parking.
Which model provides more seating capacity?
The Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT seats 2+2+3 (seven passengers), whereas the Kia Picanto seats 2+3 (five passengers).