Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 | Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018) Kia ₱635,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1248cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Natural aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 84 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 122 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 3595 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1595 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 1485 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2400 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | 913 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer + Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle + Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/55 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/55 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most economical and practical choice, the 2018 Kia Picanto 1.2 MT is the better option. It costs ₱635,000 versus ₱820,000 for the 2015 Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT, saving ₱185,000. The Picanto also offers a more efficient 1,248 cc engine that delivers 84 PS at 6,000 rpm and 122 Nm torque at 4,000 rpm, compared to the APV’s 1,590 cc engine with 91 PS at 5,750 rpm and 127 Nm torque at 4,500 rpm; the difference in power is modest but the smaller displacement translates to better fuel economy for city driving. In terms of layout, the Picanto’s front‑wheel drive and unibody construction make it lighter and easier to maneuver in tight urban streets, whereas the APV’s rear‑wheel drive and body‑on‑frame build give it a more traditional MPV feel but at the cost of higher weight and less agility. The APV seats 2+2+3 for seven passengers, which is useful if you need more space for family or cargo; the Picanto’s 2+3 seating fits five passengers, which is adequate for most commuters. Both vehicles share a 100,000‑km/3‑year warranty and five doors, but the Picanto’s hatchback body offers better cargo flexibility for everyday errands. Overall, if you prioritize lower purchase price, easier city handling, and sufficient seating for five, the Kia Picanto is the sensible choice. If you need a larger MPV that can accommodate up to seven people and don’t mind the higher cost, then consider the Suzuki APV.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Kia Picanto 1.2 MT costs ₱635,000, while the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT is priced at ₱820,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Suzuki APV’s 1,590 cc engine produces 91 PS at 5,750 rpm and 127 Nm torque at 4,500 rpm; the Kia Picanto’s 1,248 cc engine delivers 84 PS at 6,000 rpm and 122 Nm torque at 4,000 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Kia Picanto’s front‑wheel drive, unibody construction, smaller engine and hatchback body make it more agile and fuel‑efficient for city driving.
Which vehicle offers more passenger space?
The Suzuki APV seats 2+2+3 for seven passengers, whereas the Kia Picanto seats 2+3 for five.