Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0L Dropside Gas M/T SWB (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0L Dropside Gas M/T SWB (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.0L Dropside Gas M/T SWB (2025) Toyota ₱767,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 139 PS |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Pickup |
| Segment | M | Pickup |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 4965 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1800 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 1800 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | 1710 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 55 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0L Dropside Gas M/T SWB (2025): which should you buy?
The Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (₱820,000) is the better value for a Filipino buyer prioritizing space and practicality, while the Toyota Tamaraw (₱767,000) is ideal for those needing high power and reliability in a pickup. The APV offers more seating (2+2+3 vs 2) and a 5-door configuration, making it suited for families or cargo tasks. The Tamaraw’s 1998cc engine delivers 139 PS of power, exceeding the APV’s 91 PS, but its smaller cabin and manual transmission limit daily commuting convenience. Choose the APV if budget and versatility matter more than raw horsepower; opt for the Tamaraw if you demand strong engine output and plan to use the vehicle as a workhorse.