Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) Suzuki ₱598,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 996cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 68 PS @ 6000 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 90 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3500 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1600 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1470 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2360 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 890 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 155/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 155/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
The Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) is the better value for most Filipino buyers prioritizing affordability and simplicity, while the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) excels for those needing more power and comfort. The Celerio's lower price (₱598,000 vs ₱841,000) and 68 PS output make it ideal for budget-conscious drivers in urban traffic, whereas the Vios' 99 PS engine and sedan design suit commuters valuing space and refinement. Both models share a 100,000km/3-year warranty and FWD drivetrains, but the Celerio’s hatchback profile offers easier access to rear seats, while the Vios’ sedan form prioritizes passenger comfort. Choose the Celerio for daily commuting where cost matters, and the Vios when you need a smoother ride and larger interior.