Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) Suzuki ₱1,160,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2394cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 168 PS @ 6000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 227 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4500 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1810 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1683 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2640 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1580 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 66 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) and the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017), the decision hinges on intended use. The Grand Vitara, at ₱1,160,000, is a more affordable, gasoline-powered SUV with 168 PS and 227 Nm, suitable for daily commuting and light off-road use due to its body-on-frame construction. However, it has an older 4-speed automatic transmission and is not currently available. The Ranger, at ₱1,219,000, is a diesel pickup with a turbocharged engine producing 160 PS and a hefty 385 Nm of torque, making it far superior for towing, hauling, and heavy-duty work. Its 6-speed manual transmission offers better fuel efficiency and control, but it is discontinued. For a budget-conscious buyer needing a capable daily driver, the Grand Vitara is the better choice if available. For those requiring a workhorse with high torque and diesel economy, the Ranger is ideal, though finding a new unit may be challenging. Both are rear-wheel drive, but the Ranger's longer wheelbase and pickup bed provide more utility. Ultimately, the Grand Vitara suits urban and light off-road use, while the Ranger excels in commercial and heavy-duty applications.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is cheaper at ₱1,160,000 compared to the Ford Ranger at ₱1,219,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Grand Vitara has higher horsepower (168 PS vs 160 PS), but the Ranger has significantly more torque (385 Nm vs 227 Nm), making it better for towing and hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Grand Vitara is better for daily commuting due to its gasoline engine, automatic transmission, and smaller size, while the Ranger's diesel manual is more suited for work.
Which has better fuel economy?
The Ranger's diesel engine typically offers better fuel economy, especially for highway driving, but the data does not provide specific fuel consumption figures.