Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Tata ₱830,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | 4-inline | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2179cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | E-VGT w/ Intercooler | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 4000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @ 1500-3000 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5125 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1765 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3150 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1980 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 70 | 45 |
| Segment | — | M |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.5J-inch Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.5J-inch Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 235/70 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 235/70 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Ventilated Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon w/ Heater | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen w/ leveling | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and practicality, the Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl emerges as the better choice if you need a robust, diesel-powered pickup for heavy-duty tasks or occasional off-road use. Priced at ₱830,000, it is slightly cheaper than the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (₱865,000) and offers a 2179cc engine that delivers 150 PS at 4000 rpm and 320 Nm torque between 1500–3000 rpm—substantially more power and torque than the Ertiga’s 1373cc engine, which produces only 96 PS at 6000 rpm and 130 Nm at 4000 rpm. The Xenon’s body‑on‑frame construction, rear‑wheel drive and 5‑speed manual transmission make it better suited for hauling or rough terrain, while its 2+3 seating accommodates a driver, passenger and two cargo seats. The Ertiga, on the other hand, is an 8‑seat MPV with a front‑wheel drive and 4‑speed automatic, ideal for daily commuting or family use in city traffic; its unibody design and 5‑door layout provide easier access, but it lacks the diesel engine’s torque advantage. Both vehicles share a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and are currently available, so the decision hinges on whether you prioritize a powerful, utilitarian pickup (Tata) or a family‑friendly MPV with automatic convenience (Suzuki).
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl is priced at ₱830,000, while the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT costs ₱865,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Tata Xenon delivers 150 PS at 4000 rpm and 320 Nm torque, whereas the Ertiga provides only 96 PS at 6000 rpm and 130 Nm torque.
Which is better for family use?
The Suzuki Ertiga, with its 2+2+3 seating and MPV body type, is more family‑friendly for daily commuting.
Which vehicle is better for heavy-duty tasks?
The Tata Xenon’s diesel engine, body‑on‑frame construction, and rear‑wheel drive make it more suitable for heavy-duty hauling or off‑road use.