Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Tata ₱830,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2179cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged, CRDi | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 140 PS @ 4000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @ 1700-2700 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5125 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1833 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3150 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1980 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x5.5-inch Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16x5.5-inch Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/75/R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/75/R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
The Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) and the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on your primary use case. If you need a work‑horse that can haul cargo or carry a small crew for a business, the Xenon’s body‑on‑frame pickup layout, 5‑door cab, and a robust 2.2‑litre turbo‑diesel delivering 140 PS and 320 Nm of torque give it a clear advantage in pulling power and load capacity. It is priced slightly lower at ₱830,000, but note it is discontinued, so parts and service may be harder to find. Conversely, the Ertiga is a modern, five‑door MPV aimed at family or daily commuting, offering a smoother 1.4‑litre gasoline engine with 96 PS and 130 Nm, an automatic transmission, and a more compact 4,265 mm length for city maneuverability. Its current availability ensures warranty support and easier servicing. While the Ertiga costs a bit more (₱865,000), it provides better fuel‑type convenience for typical Filipino road use and seats up to seven. In summary, choose the Tata Xenon if you prioritize payload, torque and a lower upfront price for commercial or rugged tasks, accepting the risk of discontinued support. Opt for the Suzuki Ertiga if you need a comfortable, family‑friendly vehicle with automatic transmission, easier city driving, and ongoing dealer support.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Tata Xenon 2.2 costs ₱830,000, which is ₱35,000 less than the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT priced at ₱865,000.
Which one has more power?
The Tata Xenon delivers 140 PS and 320 Nm of torque, significantly higher than the Ertiga’s 96 PS and 130 Nm.
Is the Tata Xenon still available?
No, the Tata Xenon is listed as discontinued, meaning new units are no longer sold, though used examples may exist.
Which model is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Suzuki Ertiga, with its smaller dimensions, automatic transmission, gasoline engine and current availability, is better suited for everyday city driving and family use.