Tata Xenon 2.2 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Tata Xenon 2.2 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Tata Xenon 2.2 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) Tata ₱1,135,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2179cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged, CRDi | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 140 PS @ 4000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @ 1700-2700 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pickup | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5125 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1833 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3150 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1950 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x5.5-inch Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16x5.5-inch Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/75/R16 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/75/R16 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Tata Xenon 2.2 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger XLT offers more power (160 PS vs 140 PS) and a higher gear count (6-speed vs 5-speed) for better performance, making it the better choice for Filipino buyers prioritizing hauling and acceleration. The Tata Xenon 2.2 is cheaper at ₱1,135,000 but lacks the Ranger’s torque advantage (385 Nm vs 320 Nm) and transmission flexibility. Both are discontinued and share a body-on-frame construction with 4-door pickups and 2+3 seating, so the Ranger is preferable for those needing heavier loads or quicker response. Budget-conscious buyers focusing on core utility might still consider the Xenon, but the Ranger’s higher power and transmission make it the more capable option.