Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) Toyota ₱1,946,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Segment | S | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power Asisted |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT and the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT depends on your needs. The Isuzu mu-X is more practical and affordable at ₱1,845,000 (vs. ₱1,946,000 for the 86), offers high torque (380 Nm) from its turbo diesel engine, seats five, and is currently available. The Toyota 86, with 200 PS and a sporty coupe design, is not available and only seats 2+2, making it unsuitable for families. For daily commuting, cargo hauling, or long trips, the mu-X's diesel torque and SUV practicality win. The 86 is for driving enthusiasts seeking a used, rear-wheel-drive sports car, but its high price for a 2015 model and limited utility make it a niche choice. Unless you specifically want a track-oriented coupe, the Isuzu mu-X is the better all-around vehicle for Filipino roads.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Toyota 86 at ₱1,946,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota 86 has higher power at 200 PS, while the Isuzu mu-X has more torque (380 Nm vs. 205 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its diesel torque, five seats, and current availability, whereas the Toyota 86 is a 2015 model with limited seating and not available.
Which is better for long trips?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for long trips because of its larger size, higher torque for highway driving, and more comfortable SUV ride.