Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,961,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | S | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 2255 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT and the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT, price is a decisive factor: the Toyota starts at ₱1,961,000 while the Nissan costs ₱2,105,000, a difference of ₱144,000. The Toyota is a lightweight 2+2 coupe with a naturally aspirated flat‑4 engine delivering 200 PS at 7,000 rpm and 205 Nm torque between 6,400–6,600 rpm. It offers a sporty driving experience with a 6‑speed automatic transmission and rear‑wheel drive, but its short wheelbase (4,255 mm) limits cargo space. The Nissan is a van built on a body‑on‑frame chassis, powered by a turbocharged 2.5 L inline‑4 diesel that produces only 129 PS but a high torque of 356 Nm at low rpm, ideal for hauling. It comes with a 5‑speed manual gearbox and also rear‑wheel drive, but its larger body type (3 doors) makes it more practical for families or commercial use. Warranty terms are identical at 3 years/100,000 km. If the buyer prioritizes performance and a sporty aesthetic in a two‑seat coupe, the Toyota 86 is preferable. If cargo capacity, diesel torque, and van practicality are more important—especially for a small business or family—the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium is the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT costs ₱1,961,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT costs ₱2,105,000.
Which has more power?
The Toyota’s flat‑4 engine produces 200 PS at 7,000 rpm, higher than the Nissan’s 129 PS at 3,200 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota offers a sporty coupe experience with an automatic transmission, whereas the Nissan’s diesel engine provides higher low‑rpm torque (356 Nm) and van practicality for carrying passengers or cargo.
Which vehicle is more practical?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium, as a van with 3 doors and body‑on‑frame construction, offers more cargo space and versatility compared to the Toyota 86’s 2+2 coupe layout.