Toyota Alphard 2.4 L AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 2.4 L AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 2.4 L AT (2015) Toyota ₱2,970,000 | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 2362cc | 3456cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, VVT-I | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 167 PS @ 6000 rpm | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 227 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Segment | M | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4850 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1830 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1905 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2950 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16x7.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16x7.0 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 215/45 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 215/45 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Comfort Access Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Alphard 2.4 L AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the 2015 Toyota Alphard 2.4L AT (₱2,970,000) is the more budget-friendly choice, offering adequate power (167 PS) for daily family and city driving. Its 2.4L inline-4 engine returns better fuel efficiency than the V6, though official figures are not provided. The 3.5L V6 AT (₱3,379,000) costs ₱409,000 more but delivers substantially more power (275 PS) and torque (340 Nm), ideal for those who frequently drive on highways, carry heavy loads, or prioritize acceleration. Both have the same 4-speed automatic, FWD drivetrain, and 7-seat layout. However, the 3.5L's thirstier V6 and higher price may not be justified for typical city use. If budget is tight and power needs are modest, choose the 2.4L. If you demand effortless highway cruising and stronger performance, the 3.5L is worth the premium. Note both models are discontinued, so consider availability and condition when buying second-hand.
Frequently asked questions
Which Alphard is cheaper?
The 2015 Toyota Alphard 2.4L AT is cheaper at ₱2,970,000, while the 3.5L V6 AT costs ₱3,379,000.
Which Alphard is more powerful?
The 3.5L V6 produces 275 PS and 340 Nm, compared to the 2.4L's 167 PS and 227 Nm, making it significantly more powerful.
Which Alphard has better fuel economy?
The 2.4L inline-4 engine typically consumes less fuel than the 3.5L V6, but specific fuel economy data is not provided in the specs.
Which Alphard is better for daily commuting?
The 2.4L AT is more suitable for daily city commuting due to its lower price and likely better fuel efficiency, while the 3.5L V6 offers unnecessary power for stop-and-go traffic.