Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016) Audi ₱3,190,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | Unlimited/2-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1395cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 150 PS @ 5000-6000rpm |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 250 Nm@ 1500-3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 6-Speed DCT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.0:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Crossover |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4388 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1831 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1590 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2603 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1405 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 64 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | McPherson struts with aluminum lower wishbones, steel pivot bearings, aluminum subframe, tubular anti-roll bar, track-stabilizing steering roll |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Four-link with separate spring/shock absorber arrangement, subframe, aluminum wheel carriers, tubular anti-roll bar |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17" alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/55 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/55 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Electromechanical |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual-Zone Auto Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Electric |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 13 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | Yes |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Bi-Xenon |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | 8.9 seconds |
| Top Speed | — | 204 km/h |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the 2015 Toyota Alphard 3.5L V6 and the 2016 Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI, the decision hinges on priorities. The Alphard is a premium van with a powerful 275 PS V6 engine, spacious 2+2+3 seating, and a longer 4,850 mm body, ideal for large families or those needing maximum passenger comfort. However, it is discontinued, has a 4-speed automatic transmission, and costs ₱3,379,000. The Audi Q3 is a current model crossover with a turbocharged 150 PS engine, 6-speed DCT, and better fuel efficiency (1.4L vs 3.5L). It is slightly cheaper at ₱3,190,000 and offers modern features like an unlimited mileage warranty. The Q3 is more suitable for daily commuting and city driving due to its smaller size and agile handling, while the Alphard excels in long-distance travel with ample space and power. Choose the Alphard if you prioritize space and power for a large family; choose the Q3 for a newer, more efficient, and practical daily driver.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Audi Q3 is cheaper at ₱3,190,000 compared to the Toyota Alphard at ₱3,379,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota Alphard is more powerful with 275 PS and 340 Nm torque, versus the Audi Q3's 150 PS and 250 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Audi Q3 is better for daily commuting due to its smaller size, turbocharged engine for efficiency, and 6-speed DCT for smoother city driving.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Toyota Alphard seats 7 passengers (2+2+3), while the Audi Q3 is a 5-seater crossover.