Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Clubman 1.5 AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Clubman 1.5 AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Mini Clubman 1.5 AT (2016) Mini ₱2,880,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | Unlimited/2-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 136 PS @ 4400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 220 Nm @ 1250 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 6 speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Wagon |
| Segment | M | S |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 6 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4253 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1800 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1441 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2670 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1375 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 48 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 205/55 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 205/55 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt and telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Electronic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | combination of clothe and leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Electronic |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | led |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 9.1 sec |
| Top Speed | — | 205km/h |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Clubman 1.5 AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality, the Mini Clubman 1.5 AT emerges as the more sensible choice if budget and daily commuting are primary concerns. At ₱2,880,000 it is ₱499,000 cheaper than the Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT, which carries a hefty price tag of ₱3,379,000. The Mini’s 136 PS engine delivers adequate performance for city driving and its 0–100 km/h time of 9.1 seconds is respectable for a compact wagon, whereas the Alphard’s 275 PS V6 engine offers more power but at a higher cost and with a 4‑speed automatic that may feel dated. In terms of practicality, the Alphard’s van body and 2+2+3 seating configuration can accommodate up to nine passengers, making it ideal for larger families or group travel. The Mini’s 5‑door wagon layout and unibody construction provide a more agile driving experience but with less passenger capacity. Warranty coverage also differs: the Alphard offers 100,000 km/3‑year protection, while the Mini’s unlimited mileage with a 2‑year term may appeal to those who drive extensively. Ultimately, if you need the extra seating and are willing to pay more for a V6 engine, choose the Alphard; if you prioritize affordability and efficient city use, the Mini Clubman is the better pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mini Clubman 1.5 AT costs ₱2,880,000, while the Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT is priced at ₱3,379,000.
Which has more power?
The Toyota Alphard’s V6 engine produces 275 PS, whereas the Mini Clubman’s inline‑3 engine outputs 136 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mini Clubman’s 0–100 km/h time of 9.1 seconds and lower price make it more suitable for everyday city driving.
Which offers better passenger capacity?
The Toyota Alphard’s van body seats 2+2+3 (up to nine people), while the Mini Clubman’s wagon layout seats fewer passengers.