Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo S60 D4 R-Design (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo S60 D4 R-Design (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Volvo S60 D4 R-Design (2016) Volvo ₱3,295,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 2 Years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Insurance | — | Upon Request |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1969cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 181 HP @ 4250 rpm |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 400 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 8-Speed Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Segment | M | D |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4635 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1899 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1484 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2776 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1652 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 67.5 |
| Front Headroom (mm) | — | 999 |
| Rear Headroom (mm) | — | 951 |
| Front Legroom (mm) | — | 1064 |
| Rear Legroom (mm) | — | 852 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut, Coil Spring, Hydraulic Shock Absorbers, Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multilink, Independent Suspensionwith Coil Springs, Hydraulic Shock Absorber, Stabilizer Bar |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 18" Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 18" Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Discs |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Discs |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | Yes |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Remote Central Locki |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Electronic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Electric Par |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Roadside Assistance | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Bi-Xenon |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 7.3s |
| Top Speed | — | 230 |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 24.39 |
| Euro NCAP Rating | — | 5 |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo S60 D4 R-Design (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritising space, passenger capacity and a flagship feel, the 2015 Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 is the clearer choice. It seats up to seven (2+2+3) versus the Volvo S60’s five‑seat sedan layout, making it far more practical for larger families or group transport. Although the Alphard costs about ₱84,000 more, it delivers significantly higher power (275 PS vs 181 HP) and a robust V6 engine, while still offering a respectable 340 Nm of torque. The Alphard’s 4‑speed automatic is simpler but less refined than the S60’s 8‑speed, yet the van’s unibody construction and 4,850 mm length provide a roomy, comfortable cabin. Warranty coverage favors the Alphard with 3 years/100,000 km versus Volvo’s 2‑year guarantee, though the Alphard is now discontinued, meaning limited new‑car support and possibly higher resale uncertainty. The Volvo S60 D4 R‑Design, priced slightly lower, shines with better fuel economy (24.39 km/l combined), a turbo‑charged diesel engine that offers higher torque (400 Nm) and modern tech like an 8‑speed automatic and 5‑star Euro NCAP safety rating. It suits buyers who need a sporty, fuel‑efficient sedan for city commuting rather than bulk passenger hauling. In short, choose the Alphard if you need max seating, premium V6 feel and longer warranty; pick the Volvo if you prefer a current model, better fuel efficiency, higher safety rating and a sportier sedan experience.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Volvo S60 D4 R-Design is priced at ₱3,295,000, which is ₱84,000 less than the Toyota Alphard’s ₱3,379,000 price.
Which offers more power?
The Toyota Alphard’s 3.5 L V6 produces 275 PS, while the Volvo S60’s 2.0 L turbo diesel makes 181 HP, so the Alphard is considerably more powerful.
Which is more practical for a large family?
The Alphard provides a 2+2+3 seating layout for up to seven passengers, whereas the Volvo S60 seats five, making the Alphard more practical for larger families.
Which has a better warranty and safety rating?
The Alphard comes with a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, longer than the Volvo’s 2‑year warranty, while the Volvo holds a 5‑star Euro NCAP safety rating, which the Alphard’s rating is not disclosed.