Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC60 D4 (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC60 D4 (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Volvo XC60 D4 (2016) Volvo ₱3,895,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 2 Years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Insurance | — | Upon Request |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1969cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 181 HP @ 4250 rpm |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 400 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 8-Speed Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Crossover/SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4644 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1891 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1713 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2774 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1854 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 70 |
| Front Headroom (mm) | — | 1025 |
| Rear Headroom (mm) | — | 1003 |
| Front Legroom (mm) | — | 1047 |
| Rear Legroom (mm) | — | 924 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut, Coil Spring, Hydraulic Shock Absorbers, Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multilink, Independent Suspensionwith Coil Springs, Hydraulic Shock Absorber, Stabilizer Bar |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17" Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17" Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Discs |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Discs |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | Yes |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Remote Central Locki |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Electronic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Electric Par |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Roadside Assistance | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Bi-Xenon |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 8.5s |
| Top Speed | — | 210 |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 21.27 |
| Euro NCAP Rating | — | 5 |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC60 D4 (2016): which should you buy?
The Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) and Volvo XC60 D4 (2016) cater to very different needs. The Alphard is a spacious luxury van priced at ₱3,379,000, making it more affordable than the Volvo at ₱3,895,000. It offers a powerful V6 engine with 275 PS, but its 4-speed automatic transmission is dated, and fuel economy is not provided. With a 2+2+3 seating layout and van body, it is ideal for large families or VIP transport. However, it is discontinued. The Volvo XC60 D4 is a current-model diesel SUV with a turbocharged engine producing 181 HP and 400 Nm of torque, paired with an 8-speed automatic. It achieves a combined fuel economy of 21.27 km/L, has a 5-star Euro NCAP safety rating, and a 0-100 km/h time of 8.5 seconds. It is better for daily commuting, efficiency, and safety, but seats only five. For a Filipino buyer who prioritizes passenger space and luxury on a budget, choose the Alphard. For a safer, more efficient, and modern daily driver with lower running costs, choose the Volvo XC60.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: the Toyota Alphard or the Volvo XC60?
The Toyota Alphard (2015) is cheaper at ₱3,379,000 compared to the Volvo XC60 D4 (2016) at ₱3,895,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Alphard's V6 engine produces 275 PS, which is more than the Volvo XC60's 181 HP. However, the Volvo's diesel engine delivers higher torque (400 Nm vs 340 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Volvo XC60 D4 is better for daily commuting due to its superior fuel economy (21.27 km/L combined), 8-speed automatic transmission, and modern safety features (5-star Euro NCAP). The Alphard is less efficient and has a dated 4-speed automatic.
Which is more practical for a large family?
The Toyota Alphard is more practical for large families with its 2+2+3 seating for up to 7 passengers and van body. The Volvo XC60 seats only 5 and has a smaller SUV body.