Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC60 T5 (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC60 T5 (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Volvo XC60 T5 (2016) Volvo ₱3,695,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 2 Years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Insurance | — | Upon Request |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1969cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 245 HP @ 5500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 350 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 8-Speed Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Crossover/SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4644 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1891 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1713 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2774 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1833 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 70 |
| Front Headroom (mm) | — | 1025 |
| Rear Headroom (mm) | — | 1003 |
| Front Legroom (mm) | — | 1047 |
| Rear Legroom (mm) | — | 924 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut, Coil Spring, Hydraulic Shock Absorbers, Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multilink, Independent Suspensionwith Coil Springs, Hydraulic Shock Absorber, Stabilizer Bar |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | Yes |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Remote Central Locki |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Electronic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Electric Par |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Bi-Xenon |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 7.2s |
| Top Speed | — | 210 |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 14.92 |
| Euro NCAP Rating | — | 5 |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC60 T5 (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a spacious, family‑friendly vehicle with more seating capacity and a higher power output, the 2015 Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT is the better choice. It seats up to nine passengers (2+2+3 layout), offers 275 PS and 340 Nm, and comes with a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. Its price of ₱3,379,000 is slightly lower than the Volvo XC60 T5’s ₱3,695,000. However, if you prioritize a modern crossover with advanced safety ratings (Euro NCAP 5), better fuel economy (14.92 L/100 km combined), and a more powerful torque at higher RPMs (350 Nm @ 4800 rpm) for spirited driving, the Volvo XC60 T5 is preferable. The Alphard’s 4‑speed automatic and FWD layout suit long family trips, while the XC60’s 8‑speed automatic and turbocharged inline‑4 deliver quicker acceleration (0–100 km/h in 7.2 s). Ultimately, choose the Alphard for maximum passenger space and lower cost, or the XC60 for higher safety rating, better fuel efficiency, and sportier performance.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT costs ₱3,379,000, while the Volvo XC60 T5 is priced at ₱3,695,000.
Which has more power?
The Alphard’s 275 PS @ 6200 rpm exceeds the XC60’s 245 HP @ 5500 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The XC60 offers superior fuel economy (14.92 L/100 km combined) and a quicker 0–100 km/h time (7.2 s), making it more efficient for daily driving.
Which has better safety ratings?
The Volvo XC60 T5 holds a Euro NCAP rating of 5, while no safety rating is provided for the Alphard.