Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Countryman Cooper SD (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Countryman Cooper SD (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Mini Countryman Cooper SD (2017) Mini ₱3,500,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | Unlimited kms/2years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1995cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 190 PS @ 4000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 400 NM @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 8-Speed Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | CUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4299 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1822 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1557 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2670 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 51 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut Type |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link type |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 0 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 0 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt and Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Servotronic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | Yes |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Electronic |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Smart Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | 0 |
| 0–100 km/h | — | 0 |
| Top Speed | — | 0 |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | 0 |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | 0 |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 0 |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mini Countryman Cooper SD (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, power, and practicality between the Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) and the Mini Countryman Cooper SD (2017), the Alphard stands out as the more suitable choice for families or business users who need spacious seating, a robust V6 engine, and a lower purchase price. The Alphard costs ₱3,379,000 versus the Mini’s ₱3,500,000, offering a savings of ₱121,000. It also delivers higher maximum power (275 PS) and torque (340 Nm) compared to the Mini’s 190 PS and 400 Nm, while maintaining a more powerful engine displacement (3456cc vs. 1995cc). The Alphard’s 4‑speed automatic transmission and front‑wheel drive are adequate for typical Philippine road conditions, whereas the Mini’s 8‑speed automatic and all‑wheel drive are more suited to off‑road or high‑performance use, but this advantage is offset by its higher price and lack of detailed performance data. In terms of practicality, the Alphard’s 5‑door van body and 2+2+3 seating configuration provide more passenger capacity than the Mini’s unspecified layout. The Alphard also benefits from a longer warranty of 100,000 km/3‑years compared to the Mini’s unlimited kms/2‑year warranty. Overall, for buyers prioritizing affordability, power, passenger space, and a longer warranty, the Toyota Alphard is the recommended vehicle. If a buyer values AWD capability and a modern compact SUV aesthetic, they might consider the Mini Countryman despite its higher cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Alphard costs ₱3,379,000 while the Mini Countryman is priced at ₱3,500,000, so the Alphard is cheaper by ₱121,000.
Which has more power?
The Alphard’s V6 engine produces 275 PS, whereas the Mini’s turbocharged inline‑4 delivers 190 PS.
Which is better for family use?
The Alphard offers a 2+2+3 seating layout and a van body, providing more passenger capacity than the Mini’s unspecified configuration.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Alphard offers 100,000 km/3‑years of coverage, while the Mini’s warranty is unlimited kms for 2 years.