Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs BYD Tang (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs BYD Tang (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | BYD Tang (2023) BYD ₱3,421,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3456cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 515 PS |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 700 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Single Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Performance SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4970 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1950 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1745 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2820 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Snowy White, Silver Sand Black, Ridge Grey |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2560 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 21" alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 21" alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 265/45/R21 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 265/45/R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Three-Zone Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Nappa Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs BYD Tang (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality, power and cost, the 2015 Toyota Alphard offers a more affordable entry at ₱3,379,000 compared to the 2023 BYD Tang’s ₱3,421,000. The Alphard’s V6 engine delivers 275 PS and 340 Nm, while the Tang’s electric motor provides a higher peak of 515 PS and 700 Nm, making the Tang superior for performance‑oriented users. However, the Alphard’s 4‑speed automatic and FWD layout are simpler and potentially cheaper to maintain, whereas the Tang’s single‑speed electric drivetrain may reduce long‑term running costs. In terms of space, both vehicles seat 2+2+3 and share a five‑door layout; the Tang is slightly longer (4970 mm vs 4850 mm) and wider (1950 mm), offering a marginally larger interior footprint. Warranty differences are significant: the Alphard’s 100,000 km/3‑year plan is modest compared to the Tang’s generous 6‑years/150,000 km coverage. If a buyer prioritizes lower upfront cost and traditional internal‑combustion familiarity, the Alphard is preferable. If higher power output, longer warranty and electric efficiency are priorities, the Tang is the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Alphard costs ₱3,379,000, slightly less than the BYD Tang’s ₱3,421,000.
Which has more power?
The BYD Tang’s electric motor produces 515 PS and 700 Nm, far exceeding the Alphard’s 275 PS and 340 Nm.
Which offers a longer warranty?
The BYD Tang provides 6‑years/150,000 km, whereas the Alphard offers 3‑years/100,000 km.
Which is better for daily commuting?
For daily use, the Alphard’s lower price and traditional engine may appeal to those preferring conventional maintenance; the Tang’s electric power and longer warranty suit buyers seeking lower running costs and higher performance.