Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Kia Carnival 1.6L SX+ Turbo Hybrid AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Kia Carnival 1.6L SX+ Turbo Hybrid AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Kia Carnival 1.6L SX+ Turbo Hybrid AT (2025) Kia ₱3,498,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 160,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1598cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 242 PS |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 367 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Automatic 8-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | MPV AUV |
| Segment | M | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 7 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 5155 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1995 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1740 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 3090 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Aurora Black Pearl, Snow White Pearl, Ceramic Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2141 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 72 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link with coil spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Kia Carnival 1.6L SX+ Turbo Hybrid AT (2025): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer, the choice between the Toyota Alphard 3.5L V6 (2015) and the Kia Carnival 1.6L Turbo Hybrid (2025) hinges on priorities. The Alphard is ₱3,379,000, cheaper by about ₱119,000, and delivers 275 PS from its V6 engine, offering more power for those who prioritize strong acceleration and a prestigious badge. However, it uses a dated 4-speed automatic and has no hybrid fuel savings. The Carnival, at ₱3,498,000, features a modern turbo-hybrid powertrain with 242 PS and higher torque (367 Nm) via an 8-speed automatic, promising much better fuel efficiency (not explicitly given but inherent to hybrids) and lower running costs. Its 5-year/160,000 km warranty surpasses the Alphard's 3-year/100,000 km coverage, and as a current model, it offers newer technology and safety features. The Carnival also has 7 seats compared to the Alphard's 8, but both are spacious vans. For daily commuting and long-term savings, the Carnival is the smarter choice. The Alphard appeals to those who want a used luxury van with a powerful engine and lower purchase price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Alphard is cheaper at ₱3,379,000, while the Kia Carnival costs ₱3,498,000, making the Alphard about ₱119,000 less expensive.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota Alphard has higher power output at 275 PS, but the Kia Carnival has more torque at 367 Nm versus the Alphard's 340 Nm. The Alphard's V6 is stronger in peak power, while the Carnival's turbo-hybrid delivers better low-end torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Kia Carnival is better for daily commuting due to its turbo hybrid engine, which offers superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions compared to the Alphard's naturally aspirated V6. Its 8-speed automatic also provides smoother and more efficient power delivery in city traffic.
Which is more family-friendly?
Both seat 7-8 passengers, but the Kia Carnival is more family-friendly with a newer design, longer warranty (5 years/160,000 km vs 3 years/100,000 km), and hybrid efficiency that lowers running costs. The Alphard's 2+2+3 seating offers a captain's chair configuration, but its age and discontinued status mean fewer modern safety features.