Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) Mazda ₱2,990,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 254 PS @ 3750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 550 Nm @ 1500 - 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15.2:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4745 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1890 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2870 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Rhodium White Premium, Soul Red Crystal |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1897 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 58 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 20" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 20" alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/50/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/50/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023): which should you buy?
The Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (₱2,990,000) is the better value for most Filipino buyers. Its lower price (₱289,000 less) and superior AWD capability (40% better traction) make it ideal for varied Philippine roads, while the 2023 model includes a 3-year/100,000km warranty. The Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (₱3,379,000) is discontinued and offers less flexibility with only a 5-passenger capacity, though it has a longer warranty (100,000km/3 years). Choose the CX-60 for daily commuting or off-road use, or the Alphard only if you need maximum space and are willing to wait for availability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport costs ₱2,990,000, while the Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT is ₱3,379,000.
Which has more power?
The Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT produces 275 PS, compared to 254 PS for the Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport has AWD for better traction on Philippine roads, while the Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT is FWD.
Is the AWD system available on the Alphard?
No, the Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT is FWD.