Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) Mazda ₱3,780,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 300.9 PS |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 603 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 7 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 5120 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1994 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1745 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 3120 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Artisan Red Premium, Sonic Silver, Jet Black, Deep Crystal Blue Mica, Rhodium White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 74 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 21 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 275/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 275/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Toyota Alphard 3.5L V6 (2015) and the Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) hinges on priorities. The Alphard is cheaper at ₱3,379,000 but is discontinued, has older 4-speed automatic transmission, front-wheel drive, and produces 275 PS/340 Nm from a V6. It seats 7 in a 2+2+3 van layout, ideal for families needing spacious, luxurious people-moving. The CX-90 costs ₱3,780,000, is current, offers a turbocharged inline-4 with mild hybrid (300.9 PS/603 Nm), all-wheel drive, and a newer automatic transmission. It seats 7 in a large crossover SUV form, delivering superior torque, better fuel efficiency, and modern features. If you want the latest technology, more power, AWD capability, and a newer vehicle, the CX-90 is the clear choice. If you prioritize a lower price and a traditional luxury van despite older tech and no AWD, the Alphard remains a viable option. However, the CX-90's significantly higher torque and modern drivetrain make it more versatile for daily driving and varied road conditions in the Philippines.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Toyota Alphard or the Mazda CX-90?
The Toyota Alphard (2015) is cheaper at ₱3,379,000, while the Mazda CX-90 (2024) costs ₱3,780,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Mazda CX-90 produces 300.9 PS and 603 Nm, significantly more than the Alphard's 275 PS and 340 Nm.
Is the Alphard still available for purchase?
No, the Toyota Alphard (2015) is discontinued, while the Mazda CX-90 (2024) is currently available.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Mazda CX-90 is better for daily commuting due to its newer engine, higher torque, all-wheel drive, and modern transmission, offering improved efficiency and handling. The Alphard's older 4-speed automatic and front-wheel drive may feel less refined.