Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC40 B5 R-Design (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC40 B5 R-Design (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 | Volvo XC40 B5 R-Design (2024) Volvo ₱3,690,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3456cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm | 264 PS |
| Max Torque | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm | 390 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4425 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1863 |
| Height (mm) | 1905 | 1652 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2702 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1726 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 54 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/50R19 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 235/50R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 13 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) vs Volvo XC40 B5 R-Design (2024): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers choosing between the Toyota Alphard 3.5 V6 (2015) at ₱3,379,000 and the Volvo XC40 B5 R-Design (2024) at ₱3,690,000, the decision hinges on priorities. The Alphard offers a spacious 7-seat van layout ideal for large families or chauffeur-driven needs, with a powerful 275 PS V6 engine, though its 4-speed automatic and FWD are dated. The XC40 is a modern small crossover with 264 PS, 390 Nm torque, AWD, and a more contemporary automatic transmission, better suited for daily commuting and urban driving. However, the XC40 seats only 5, lacks the Alphard's prestige and interior room, and costs ₱311,000 more. The Alphard is discontinued, so buyers face older tech and warranty expiration, while the XC40 comes with a 5-year/150,000 km warranty. Choose the Alphard if you prioritize passenger capacity and a traditional luxury van experience; choose the XC40 for modern safety, AWD capability, and lower running costs. The Alphard's higher horsepower (275 vs 264 PS) is marginal, but the XC40's superior torque (390 Nm) and newer transmission offer better drivability. For most Filipino families, the Alphard's space is unmatched, but the XC40's fresh design and features make it the smarter daily driver.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Alphard (2015) is cheaper at ₱3,379,000 versus the Volvo XC40 (2024) at ₱3,690,000, a difference of ₱311,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Alphard's 3.5L V6 produces 275 PS, slightly more than the XC40's 264 PS. However, the XC40 has higher torque (390 Nm vs 340 Nm) and a more modern transmission.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Volvo XC40 is better for daily commuting due to its AWD, newer automatic transmission, smaller size for easier parking, and current warranty coverage.
Which is better for large families?
The Toyota Alphard is better for large families with its 7-seat capacity (2+2+3 layout) and van body, offering more passenger space than the XC40's 5 seats.