Toyota Avanza 1.3 E AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Avanza 1.3 E AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Avanza 1.3 E AT (2015) Toyota ₱891,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1329cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 95 PS @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 121 Nm @ 4200 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-speed A/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | MPV |
| Segment | M | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4140 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1660 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1695 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2655 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1080 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.0 | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.0 | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 185/70 R14 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/70 R14 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt + tele |
| Steering Ratio | 4.7 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Manual | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Avanza 1.3 E AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers seeking a budget-friendly 7-seater MPV, the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) at ₱865,000 is the better value. It is ₱26,000 cheaper than the Toyota Avanza 1.3 E AT (2015) at ₱891,000, yet offers slightly more power (96 PS vs 95 PS) and torque (130 Nm vs 121 Nm). The Ertiga also has a longer body (4265 mm vs 4140 mm), which may translate to more cargo space, and its front-wheel-drive layout provides better fuel efficiency and handling for daily commuting. However, the Avanza is rear-wheel-drive, which can be advantageous for carrying heavy loads or towing. Both have similar warranties and are from the same MPV segment, but the Ertiga's lower price and newer model year (2016 vs 2015) make it the more practical choice for families on a budget. Choose the Avanza if you need RWD for rough roads or heavy loads; otherwise, the Ertiga offers better value for daily use.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Toyota Avanza or Suzuki Ertiga?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) is cheaper at ₱865,000, while the Toyota Avanza 1.3 E AT (2015) costs ₱891,000, making the Ertiga ₱26,000 more affordable.
Which has more power and torque?
The Suzuki Ertiga has slightly more power (96 PS vs 95 PS) and more torque (130 Nm vs 121 Nm), giving it a small performance edge over the Avanza.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Ertiga is better for daily commuting due to its front-wheel-drive layout, which offers better fuel efficiency and handling in city traffic, plus a lower price.
Which has more seating capacity?
Both seat 7, but the Avanza has a 2+3+2 layout while the Ertiga has 2+2+3, which may affect access to the third row. The Ertiga is longer (4265 mm vs 4140 mm), potentially offering more legroom or cargo space.