Toyota Camry 2.5 V AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Camry 2.5 V AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Camry 2.5 V AT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,896,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 178 PS @ 6000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 231 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | D | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1825 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1470 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1490 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Dual-Link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Steering Ratio | 5.5 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot brake | Manual |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Camry 2.5 V AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a comfortable, fuel‑efficient sedan with a modest price tag and decent power, the 2015 Toyota Camry 2.5 V AT is the better pick. It offers a slightly lower price (₱1,896,000 vs ₱1,845,000) and a comparable engine output (178 PS vs 177 PS), but the Camry’s front‑wheel drive and sedan body type make it more suitable for daily commuting, city driving, and family use. The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2, while priced only ₱1,845,000, is a diesel‑powered SUV with rear‑wheel drive and a larger torque output (380 Nm), which could appeal to buyers who need more cargo space, better off‑road capability, or a vehicle that can handle heavier loads. However, its turbo diesel engine and SUV form factor may lead to higher fuel consumption and maintenance costs for typical urban use. In short, choose the Camry if you prioritize everyday comfort and fuel economy; opt for the mu‑X if you need a rugged, higher‑torque SUV for occasional off‑road or heavy‑load tasks.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 is slightly cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Toyota Camry 2.5 V AT at ₱1,896,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
Both vehicles have similar peak power—178 PS for the Camry and 177 PS for the mu‑X—but the mu‑X delivers significantly higher torque at 380 Nm versus 231 Nm for the Camry.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Camry, being a front‑wheel drive sedan with a smaller engine displacement and lower fuel consumption typical of gasoline engines, is better suited for daily commuting.
Which vehicle offers more practicality?
The mu‑X, as a 4×2 SUV with rear‑wheel drive and higher torque, offers more practicality for cargo space and occasional off‑road use, while the Camry provides a standard sedan layout suitable for family seating.