Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) Toyota ₱1,958,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3956cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 268 PS @ 5200 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 366 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4670 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1905 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1830 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2690 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2510 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid live axle, four link system | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/70 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power Asisted |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer, the choice between the Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0L V6 4WD AT (2015) at ₱1,958,000 and the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) at ₱1,845,000 hinges on your priorities. The FJ Cruiser offers superior power (268 PS vs. 177 PS) and full-time AWD, making it a stronger off-roader with a body-on-frame construction, ideal for adventure seekers. However, it is older (2015 model), more expensive by ₱113,000, and its gas V6 engine is less fuel-efficient than the mu-X's diesel turbo. The Isuzu mu-X, on the other hand, is a newer (2018), more affordable SUV with a diesel engine that produces higher torque (380 Nm vs. 366 Nm) for better hauling and fuel economy. It is also longer and wider, offering more interior space, though it is RWD only and less capable off-road. For daily commuting, highway driving, or family use, the mu-X is the more practical and cost-effective choice. If you need raw power and off-road capability and can accept the higher price and gas consumption, pick the FJ Cruiser.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,845,000, while the Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0L V6 4WD AT (2015) costs ₱1,958,000, a difference of ₱113,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota FJ Cruiser is more powerful with 268 PS, compared to the Isuzu mu-X's 177 PS. However, the mu-X has higher torque (380 Nm vs. 366 Nm) at lower rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its diesel engine, which typically offers better fuel economy, and its newer 2018 model with a 6-speed automatic transmission. The FJ Cruiser's gas V6 and older design make it less efficient for daily use.
Which has better off-road capability?
The Toyota FJ Cruiser has better off-road capability with AWD, body-on-frame construction, and higher ground clearance (though not specified, it's known for off-road prowess). The Isuzu mu-X is RWD and less suited for rough terrain.