Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 L D-4D AT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 L D-4D AT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 L D-4D AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,936,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 2982cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3400 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 410 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4760 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1885 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1890 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2790 | 3343 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 18x7.5" Alloys | — |
| Rear Wheels | 18x7.5" Alloys | — |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | — |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | — |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 L D-4D AT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a midsize luxury SUV against a full‑size family hauler, the choice hinges on budget, power needs and cabin space. The 2015 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 L D‑4D costs ₱3,936,000, about ₱322,000 less than the 2018 Ford Expedition Limited MAX, and it carries a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty like the Expedition. However, the Prado’s 163 PS and 410 Nm of torque are modest compared with the Expedition’s {375 PS, 640 Nm}, giving the Ford a far stronger performance envelope, especially for highway passing and heavy loads. Seating is another divider: the Prado fits 2+3+2 (seven seats) whiletheford . The Expedition also offers a longer wheelbase (5636 mm vs 4760 mm), translating to more interior room and cargo capacity, but its larger size may be less maneuverable in tight city streets. The Prado’s body‑on‑frame construction and 4WD make it a proven off‑road companion, yet it is discontinued, so parts and service could become harder to source over time. If you prioritize lower upfront cost, proven reliability and occasional off‑road use, the Prado is suitable for a smaller family or a buyer who values Toyota’s resale strength. If you need maximum power, extra seating, and spaciousness for larger groups or heavy cargo, and can afford the higher price, the Ford Expedition is the better fit.
Frequently asked questions
Which SUV is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 L D‑4D AT (2015) is priced at ₱3,936,000, which is about ₱322,000 less than the Ford Expedition 3.5 L EcoBoost (2018) priced at ₱4,258,000.
Which model offers more power and torque?
The Ford Expedition delivers 375 PS and 640 Nm of torque, far exceeding the Prado’s 163 PS and 410 Nm.
How do the seating capacities compare?
The Prado seats 7 (2+3+2) while the Expedition seats 8 (2+3+3), giving the Ford a higher passenger capacity.
Is one better suited for daily city driving?
The smaller, shorter Prado (4,760 mm) is easier to maneuver in tight urban traffic, whereas the longer Expedition (5,636 mm) offers more space but may be less convenient for city use.