Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) Volkswagen ₱950,000 |
Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015)
Suzuki
₱975,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1598cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 105 PS @ 5250rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 153 Nm @ 3750rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | EU 4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV AUV |
| Segment | B | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3970 | 4230 |
| Width (mm) | 1682 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1462 | 1855 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2470 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1098 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 46 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 14x5.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 14x5.5 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electromechanical Assist | — |
| Steering Column | Tilt/Telescopic | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Volkswagen Polo Hatch and Suzuki APV depends on your primary need: daily driving practicality or people-hauling capacity. The Polo (₱950,000) is a compact hatchback with a more powerful engine (105 PS vs 91 PS) and a smooth 6-speed automatic transmission, making it better for city commuting and highway driving. It offers superior acceleration and driving refinement, but is limited to 5 seats and has a smaller cargo area. The APV (₱975,000) is a body-on-frame MPV with 8 seats and RWD, ideal for large families or those who need to carry many passengers and cargo. Its manual transmission and lower power (127 Nm torque) make it less nimble in traffic but more durable for rough roads. The Polo is discontinued, so availability may be limited to used units, while the APV is still current. The Polo has a longer unlimited-mileage warranty (2 years) vs APV's 3-year/100,000 km warranty. If you prioritize driving fun, fuel efficiency (inferred from lighter weight), and easy parking, choose the Polo. If you need maximum passenger capacity and ruggedness for provincial roads or business use, the APV is the better buy despite being slightly more expensive and less powerful.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Volkswagen Polo Hatch is ₱950,000, which is ₱25,000 cheaper than the Suzuki APV at ₱975,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Volkswagen Polo produces 105 PS and 153 Nm of torque, while the Suzuki APV produces 91 PS and 127 Nm. The Polo is significantly more powerful.
Which is better for a large family?
The Suzuki APV seats 8 passengers (2+3+3) and has a body-on-frame construction, making it ideal for large families. The Polo only seats 5.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Volkswagen Polo, with its automatic transmission, higher power, and lighter hatchback body, is better for daily city commuting. The APV's manual transmission and lower power make it less convenient in traffic.