Audi A1 Hatchback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A1 Hatchback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A1 Hatchback 1.4 TFSI (2016) Audi ₱1,890,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1395cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 125 PS @ 5000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 1400-4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 8.8 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 204km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Segment | A | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 3 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3973 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1740 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1416 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2469 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1115 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson struts with lower wishbones, anti-roll bar, track-stabilizingsteering roll radius, steel subframe | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion-beam with separate spring/shock absorber | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16" alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16" alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 13 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Audi A1 Hatchback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice hinges on lifestyle and priorities. The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) at ₱1,845,000 is the better value for most. It is cheaper by ₱45,000, offers a diesel engine with 177 PS and 380 Nm—superior torque for hauling or off-road use—and seats five with ample cargo space (4825 mm long, 1860 mm wide). Its 6-speed automatic and RWD layout suit provincial roads or heavy traffic, and diesel fuel typically provides lower running costs. In contrast, the Audi A1 Hatchback 1.4 TFSI (2016) at ₱1,890,000 is a premium compact hatchback: 125 PS turbo gas, 7-speed DCT, FWD, and quicker off the line (0-60 mph in 8.8 sec). It excels as a city runabout with easy parking, but the smaller size and higher price make it less practical for families or cargo duties. The A1's 2-year unlimited mileage warranty benefits high-mileage drivers, while the mu-X offers 3 years/100,000 km coverage. Ultimately, if you prioritize space, durability, and lower purchase price, get the mu-X. If you want a sporty, badge-rich city car and don't need utility, the A1 appeals.
Frequently asked questions
Which one is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Audi A1 at ₱1,890,000 – a difference of ₱45,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm, significantly more than the Audi A1's 125 PS and 200 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Audi A1, being a compact hatchback, is easier to maneuver and park in tight urban spaces. However, the mu-X's diesel engine may offer better fuel economy over long commutes, but its larger size can be cumbersome in heavy traffic.
Which has a better warranty?
The Audi A1 has a 2-year unlimited mileage warranty, while the Isuzu mu-X offers a 3-year or 100,000 km warranty. The Audi's unlimited mileage is better for high-mileage drivers; the Isuzu's longer term suits average usage.