Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI DCT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI DCT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI DCT (2016) Audi ₱1,990,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1390cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Direct Injection | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 122 PS @ 6000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Segment | B | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 3954 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1740 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1416 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2469 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1150 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI DCT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI DCT (2016) and the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018), the choice hinges on purpose, budget and driving environment. The Audi is a compact hatchback priced at ₱1,990,000 with a 1.4‑liter turbocharged gasoline engine delivering 122 PS and 200 Nm, a 7‑speed dual‑clutch transmission, and front‑wheel drive. It offers a lightweight, sporty feel suitable for city commuting and short trips, with five doors and seating for five. Its warranty is unlimited or two years, but the model is discontinued, limiting future availability and parts support. In contrast, the Isuzu mu‑X is a larger SUV priced at ₱2,145,000 with a 3.0‑liter turbo diesel engine producing 177 PS and 380 Nm, a 6‑speed automatic transmission, and four‑wheel drive. It seats up to seven across three rows, has a longer wheelbase (4825 mm) and wider body (1860 mm), making it better for families, cargo, or off‑road use. The warranty covers 100 000 km over three years, and the model is still in production. If your priority is a stylish, economical city car with lower upfront cost and you don’t need extra space or off‑road capability, the Audi is preferable. If you require more power, higher torque for heavier loads or off‑road adventures, and larger seating capacity, the Isuzu mu‑X is the more practical choice. Ultimately, budget, intended use and vehicle longevity should guide your decision.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
The Audi A1 Sportback costs ₱1,990,000 while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 costs ₱2,145,000, making the Audi cheaper by ₱155,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm, whereas the Audi generates 122 PS and 200 Nm; thus the Isuzu has higher power and torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Audi’s compact hatchback design, front‑wheel drive and lower power consumption make it more suited for city driving compared to the larger SUV.
Which model offers better practicality?
The Isuzu mu‑X seats up to seven, has a longer length (4825 mm) and four‑wheel drive, offering greater cargo space and versatility than the Audi’s five‑seat hatchback.