Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) Audi ₱1,990,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1395cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 125 PS @ 5000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 1400-4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 8.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 204km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Segment | A | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3973 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1746 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1422 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2469 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1140 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson struts with lower wishbones, anti-roll bar, track-stabilizing steering roll radius, steel subframe | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion-beam with separate spring/shock absorber | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16" alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16" alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 13 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Audi A1 Sportback and the Isuzu mu-X boils down to lifestyle. The mu-X (₱1,845,000) is cheaper, more powerful (177 PS, 380 Nm), and vastly more practical: it seats 5, has 4 doors, a diesel engine suited for long drives or hauling, and comes with a longer 3-year/100,000-km warranty. The A1 (₱1,990,000) is a premium hatchback with a smaller 1.4L turbo gas engine (125 PS, 200 Nm), FWD, and a 7-speed DCT; it's more nimble in the city and has a higher top speed (204 km/h vs. unknown for mu-X). However, the A1 is older (2016 vs. 2018), has fewer seats, less torque, and no off-road capability. Choose the mu-X if you need space, ruggedness, and lower running costs (diesel, bigger warranty). Choose the A1 if you prioritize city maneuverability, badge prestige, and sporty handling—but be prepared for higher fuel costs and limited practicality. Both are current models, but the mu-X offers better value for a family or workhorse.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Audi A1 Sportback at ₱1,990,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, both higher than the Audi A1's 125 PS and 200 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Audi A1 is smaller and more maneuverable with a DCT, ideal for tight city streets. However, the mu-X offers a diesel engine for better fuel economy on longer commutes.
Which vehicle is more practical for a family?
The Isuzu mu-X seats up to 5 with four doors and has a larger body, making it far more practical for family use than the two-door Audi A1 hatchback.