Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) Audi ₱1,990,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1395cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 125 PS @ 5000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 1400-4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 8.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 204km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Segment | A | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 3973 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1746 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1422 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2469 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1140 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson struts with lower wishbones, anti-roll bar, track-stabilizing steering roll radius, steel subframe | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion-beam with separate spring/shock absorber | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16" alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16" alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 13 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) and the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x4 3.0 AT (2018) hinges on lifestyle and priorities. The Audi is a premium compact hatchback priced at ₱1,990,000, offering a refined 1.4L turbo gas engine (125 PS, 200 Nm) with a 7-speed DCT, ideal for city driving and parking ease. Its 2-year unlimited km warranty is generous but short on term. In contrast, the Isuzu mu-X is a rugged 7-seat SUV at ₱2,145,000, with a powerful 3.0L turbo-diesel (177 PS, 380 Nm) and 4WD, better for off-road, heavy cargo, and long-distance travel. It has a 3-year/100,000 km warranty. The Isuzu is larger (4,825mm long), more versatile for families, and suited for provincial roads or flooding. If you prioritize badge prestige, fuel economy (gas vs diesel), and urban maneuverability, get the Audi. If you need space, towing, off-road capability, and diesel efficiency, choose the Isuzu. The ₱155,000 price difference is justified by the Isuzu's extra practicality for most Filipino households.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Audi A1 is cheaper at ₱1,990,000 compared to the Isuzu mu-X at ₱2,145,000, a difference of ₱155,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu mu-X is more powerful with 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, versus the Audi A1's 125 PS and 200 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Audi A1 is better for city commuting due to its smaller size (Segment A hatchback), lighter weight, and gas engine, making it easier to park and maneuver in traffic.
Which is better for off-road and family use?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for off-road and family use, with 4WD, a diesel engine with high torque, 7 seats, and a larger body (4,825mm long) suitable for rough terrain and hauling the whole family.