Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) Audi ₱4,430,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 1968cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 15.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 174 PS @ 4200 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 9.0 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 204km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4629 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1898 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1655 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2807 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1830 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 75 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent, five-link axle with front track rod, aluminum transverse link, subframe and tubular anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Independent , five-link axle with rear track rod, resiliently mounted subframe and tubular anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 18" alloy | — |
| Rear Wheels | 18" alloy | — |
| Front Tires | 235/60 R18 | — |
| Rear Tires | 235/60 R18 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-Zone Auto Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Electric | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 13 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱4,430,000 versus ₱4,258,000 for the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018). Its 174 PS diesel engine delivers strong torque for AWD capability, while the Ford’s 375 PS V6 offers significantly more power but comes with a higher price. The Audi’s 7-speed DCT transmission and AWD system are suited for varied terrain, whereas the Ford’s 10-speed automatic and 4WD prioritize stability in diverse conditions. The Audi’s unlimited/2-year warranty provides long-term peace of mind, while the Ford’s 3-year/100,000km coverage is standard for this segment. For daily commuting, the Audi’s 0–60 mph time of 9.0 seconds and 204 km/h top speed are competitive, though the Ford’s larger cabin and higher torque may appeal to those needing extra space. Overall, the Audi balances affordability and performance better for typical Filipino drivers seeking versatility.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) costs ₱4,258,000, which is ₱172,000 less than the Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) at ₱4,430,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) produces 375 PS, 21 PS more than the Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016)’s 174 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) accelerates from 0–60 mph in 9.0 seconds and reaches 204 km/h, offering sufficient performance for daily use.
What is the warranty coverage?
The Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro (2016) has an unlimited/2-year warranty, while the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) offers a 3-year/100,000km warranty.