Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) Audi ₱4,490,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 1984cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 230 PS @4500-6200 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 370 Nm @ 1600-4300 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 5.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 250km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Segment | S | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4177 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1832 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1353 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2505 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1260 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 50 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson struts with aluminum lower wishbones, aluminum pivot bearings, aluminum subframe, tubular anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Four-link with separate spring/shock absorber arrangement, subframe, aluminum wheel carriers, tubular anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 18" alloy | — |
| Rear Wheels | 18" alloy | — |
| Front Tires | 245/40 R18 | — |
| Rear Tires | 245/40 R18 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-Zone Auto Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Electric | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) is better for Filipino buyers prioritizing performance and style, while the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) suits those needing heavy-duty utility. The TT costs ₱4,490,000 versus ₱4,258,000, making it cheaper by ₱232,000. It delivers 230 PS vs 375 PS, with a 7-speed DCT vs 10-speed A/T transmission. The TT is a coupe (segment S) with FWD, while the Expedition is an SUV (segment J) with 4WD and 5 doors. The TT’s 0–60 mph time of 5.9 seconds and top speed of 250 km/h contrast with the Expedition’s practicality for 2+3+3 seating and 5636 mm length. Choose the TT for spirited driving and limited-access roads; opt for the Expedition if you need off-road capability and family space.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) costs ₱4,258,000, ₱232,000 less than the Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) at ₱4,490,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) produces 375 PS, compared to 230 PS for the Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) is a coupe with FWD, while the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) is an SUV with 4WD and 5 doors, making the latter more practical for daily commuting with family capacity.
What transmission does each have?
The Audi TT 2.0 TFSI CP (2016) uses a 7-speed DCT, while the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) uses a 10-speed A/T.