Honda Accord 2.4 S (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Accord 2.4 S (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Accord 2.4 S (2016) Honda ₱1,884,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2356cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 175 PS @ 6200 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 226 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | D | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4890 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1465 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1542 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Multi-Link Coil w/ Stabilizer | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/50 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/50 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Honda Accord 2.4 S (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a comfortable, fuel‑efficient daily commuter with a spacious interior and lower running costs, the 2016 Honda Accord 2.4 S is the better choice. It offers a naturally aspirated 2.356‑litre inline‑4 that delivers 175 PS and 226 Nm, a 5‑speed automatic transmission, and front‑wheel drive—ideal for city traffic. Its sedan body type and 4‑door layout provide ample legroom for a family of five, while the 100 000 km/3‑year warranty covers typical wear. The Accord’s price of ₱1,884,000 is only slightly higher than the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2’s ₱1,845,000. However, the mu‑X is a 3.0‑litre turbocharged diesel with 177 PS and an impressive 380 Nm of torque, a 6‑speed automatic, and rear‑wheel drive—better suited for heavier loads or occasional off‑road use. Its SUV body type and 4‑door layout also accommodate five passengers, but its diesel engine will incur higher fuel costs in the Philippines’ gasoline‑heavy market. Thus, if daily commuting and lower operating expenses are priorities, choose the Accord; if you need more torque for occasional heavy‑duty tasks and can accept higher fuel costs, the mu‑X is preferable.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 is slightly cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Honda Accord 2.4 S priced at ₱1,884,000.
Which has more power?
The Honda Accord’s 2.356‑litre inline‑4 produces 175 PS, while the Isuzu mu‑X’s 3.0‑litre turbocharged diesel produces 177 PS; the mu‑X also offers a higher torque of 380 Nm versus 226 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Accord’s front‑wheel drive, naturally aspirated engine, and sedan body make it more fuel‑efficient and comfortable for city driving.
Which vehicle offers better practicality?
Both vehicles seat five and have 4 doors, but the mu‑X’s SUV body type may provide more cargo space for larger items, whereas the Accord offers a more traditional sedan layout.