Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT (White Orchid Pearl) (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT (White Orchid Pearl) (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT (White Orchid Pearl) (2016) Honda ₱1,561,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC VTEC Turbo 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.6 : 1 | 15:1 |
| Aspiration | Direct Injected, VTEC Turbo | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 173 PS @ 5,500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 220Nm @ 1,700-5,500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Segment | C | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4633 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1799 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1416 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1308 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 47 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Stabilizer | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Multi-Link | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 215/50 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electric | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT (White Orchid Pearl) (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Honda Civic RS Turbo and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard depends entirely on your needs. The Civic is a sporty compact sedan with a powerful 173 PS turbo gasoline engine and CVT, ideal for daily commuting and spirited driving, priced at ₱1,561,000. The NV350 Urvan is a diesel van with 129 PS and high torque (356 Nm), designed for passenger or cargo transport, with a body-on-frame construction and manual transmission, priced at ₱1,570,000. If you need a practical, fuel-efficient (diesel) vehicle for carrying people or goods, the Urvan is the better choice. If you prioritize driving enjoyment, modern features, and a refined ride, the Civic wins. The Civic is cheaper by ₱9,000, but the Urvan offers more space and utility. Neither has fuel economy or performance figures provided, so base your decision on body type and engine characteristics.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Honda Civic RS Turbo is cheaper at ₱1,561,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000, a difference of ₱9,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Honda Civic RS Turbo has higher power output at 173 PS, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan produces 129 PS. However, the Urvan has higher torque (356 Nm) for hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda Civic RS Turbo is better for daily commuting due to its car-like handling, CVT transmission, and gasoline engine, while the Urvan is a van with manual transmission and diesel engine, more suited for transport.
Which has a diesel engine?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan has a turbocharged diesel engine, while the Honda Civic RS Turbo runs on gasoline.