Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT 2-Tone (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT 2-Tone (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT 2-Tone (2016) Honda ₱1,565,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1496cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve i-VTEC | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Hybrid | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas/Electric | Diesel |
| Max Power | 135 PS @ 6600 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 171 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | B | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4301 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1740 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1395 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2435 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1155 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 205/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | keyless Auto | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather and Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Key Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT 2-Tone (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
These two vehicles could not be more different despite nearly identical prices (₱1,565,000 vs ₱1,570,000). The Honda CR-Z is a sporty hybrid coupe with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine + hybrid system producing 135 PS and 171 Nm, paired to a CVT. It seats 2+2, has a 3-door body, and is discontinued—buyer must find used stock. The Nissan NV350 Urvan is a diesel turbo van with a 2.5L engine making 129 PS but massive 356 Nm torque, with a 5-speed manual and RWD, seating many more (seating capacity not specified but typical van). It is a current model with warranty support. Your choice depends entirely on need: if you want a fuel-efficient, fun-to-drive coupe for solo or occasional rear passengers, the CR-Z offers hybrid economy and unique styling. But if you need to transport people or cargo daily, the NV350 provides immense practicality, diesel torque, and body-on-frame durability. The CR-Z is a niche lifestyle car; the NV350 is a workhorse. For a Filipino buyer, the NV350 is the more sensible choice for families or businesses, while the CR-Z is for enthusiasts seeking a rare hybrid coupe.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Honda CR-Z is slightly cheaper at ₱1,565,000 compared to the NV350 at ₱1,570,000, but the difference is negligible—only ₱5,000.
Which has more power?
The CR-Z has higher horsepower at 135 PS vs 129 PS, but the NV350 has much higher torque (356 Nm vs 171 Nm), making it stronger for hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
For a solo commuter wanting fuel efficiency and fun, the CR-Z hybrid is better. For transporting family or goods, the NV350 van is far more practical, though it uses diesel.
Which is more available?
The Nissan NV350 is a current model, so it's available new from dealers. The Honda CR-Z is discontinued, so you'd have to find a used unit.