Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016) Honda ₱1,535,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1496cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve i-VTEC | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Hybrid | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas/Electric | Diesel |
| Max Power | 135 PS @ 6600 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 171 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | B | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4301 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1740 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1395 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2435 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1155 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 205/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | keyless Auto | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather and Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Key Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
If you need a practical and spacious workhorse for carrying passengers or cargo, the Nissan NV350 Urvan is the clear choice. It offers a diesel engine with immense torque (356 Nm) for heavy loads, a body-on-frame construction for durability, and a current model with warranty support. Its price is only ₱35,000 more than the CR-Z, but it delivers vastly different utility. However, if you prioritize fuel efficiency, sporty looks, and a more engaging drive for daily commuting, the Honda CR-Z Hybrid stands out. Its hybrid powertrain (135 PS) and CVT provide a smoother, more efficient ride, though it seats only 2+2 and has limited cargo space. The CR-Z is discontinued, meaning fewer parts and support. In short: choose the NV350 for work and family hauling, or the CR-Z for a fun, eco-friendly personal car. Neither is a direct competitor; your choice depends purely on lifestyle needs.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda CR-Z is slightly cheaper at ₱1,535,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000, a difference of ₱35,000.
Which has more power?
The Honda CR-Z produces 135 PS, higher than the NV350's 129 PS. However, the NV350 has significantly more torque (356 Nm vs 171 Nm), making it better for hauling heavy loads.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The CR-Z, with its hybrid powertrain and CVT, offers a more efficient and smoother drive for city use. The NV350's diesel engine and manual transmission are better suited for carrying passengers or cargo over long distances.
Which is more practical for a family?
The Nissan NV350 is far more practical for a family due to its van body, higher seating capacity (data does not specify exact seats but typical 12-15), and larger cargo space. The CR-Z only seats 2+2 and has minimal luggage room.