Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) Honda ₱1,440,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1496cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve i-VTEC | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Hybrid | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas/Electric | Diesel |
| Max Power | 136 PS @ 6600 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 171 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Pick Up |
| Segment | B | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 3 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4301 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1740 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1395 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2435 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1155 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 205/45 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 205/45 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | keyless Auto | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather and Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | Manual |
| Key Type | keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6-Speakers | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
The Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) is better for buyers prioritizing fuel efficiency and compact urban driving, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) suits those needing towing capacity and off-road capability. The CR-Z costs ₱1,440,000 versus ₱1,328,000, and its 136 PS hybrid engine paired with gas/electric operation makes it lighter and more economical. The Ranger offers 160 PS from a turbocharged diesel engine, 385 Nm torque, and a 2+3 seating layout with a 5277 mm length, ideal for hauling. Both have 100,000km/3-year warranties, but the CR-Z’s coupe design and FWD drivetrain emphasize agility, while the Ranger’s RWD, 4-door, and Pick-Up classification highlight practicality for work and adventure. Given the CR-Z’s discontinued status and the Ranger’s current availability, the choice depends on budget, space needs, and driving intent.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) costs ₱1,328,000, while the Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) is ₱1,440,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) delivers 160 PS compared to the Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016)’s 136 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) is more suited for daily commuting due to its 136 PS hybrid engine and 2+2 seating, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) prioritizes space and power for work.
What drivetrain does the Ranger use?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) uses a rear-wheel-drive (RWD) drivetrain.