Hyundai Veloster 1.6 Turbo (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai Veloster 1.6 Turbo (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai Veloster 1.6 Turbo (2016) Hyundai ₱1,588,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,595,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1591cc | 1898cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged, Direct Injection | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 204 PS @ 6000 rpm | 150 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 265 Nm @ 1750-4500 rpm | 350 Nm @ 1800 - 2600 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 6-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 16.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Segment | C | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4250 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1805 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1405 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2650 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs |
| Rear Suspension | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/40/R18 | 255/60/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/40/R18 | 255/60/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Projector Type + Auto Light Control | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Hyundai Veloster 1.6 Turbo (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Hyundai Veloster 1.6 Turbo (2016) and Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018) are vastly different vehicles, each suited for distinct needs. The Veloster is a sporty, discontinued 3-door hatchback with a turbocharged gas engine producing 204 PS and 265 Nm, paired with a 7-speed DCT. It offers a fun driving experience but limited practicality with 2+2 seating and a ₱1,588,000 price tag. In contrast, the mu-X is a current body-on-frame SUV with a diesel engine (150 PS, 350 Nm) and 6-speed automatic, seating 7 (2+3+2) and priced at ₱1,595,000. It excels in durability, fuel economy, and off-road capability. For a Filipino buyer, the mu-X is the better choice if you need a family vehicle, can handle rough roads, or require towing capacity. The Veloster appeals to enthusiasts seeking a unique, performance-oriented car, but its discontinuation and lack of practicality make it less versatile. Unless you specifically want a sporty coupe-like hatchback, the mu-X offers more value for money and long-term usability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Hyundai Veloster or the Isuzu mu-X?
The Hyundai Veloster is priced at ₱1,588,000, while the Isuzu mu-X is ₱1,595,000. The Veloster is slightly cheaper by ₱7,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Hyundai Veloster has a higher power output of 204 PS compared to the Isuzu mu-X's 150 PS. However, the mu-X produces more torque (350 Nm vs 265 Nm), which is better for towing and off-road driving.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai Veloster, with its turbocharged gas engine and 7-speed DCT, offers a sporty and responsive drive for city and highway commuting. The Isuzu mu-X, being a diesel SUV, provides better fuel economy and durability but may be less agile in traffic due to its size and body-on-frame construction.
Which vehicle is more practical for a family?
The Isuzu mu-X is far more practical for a family, with 7 seats (2+3+2), a body-on-frame chassis for durability, and a diesel engine for long-distance travel. The Hyundai Veloster only seats 2+2 and has limited cargo space, making it unsuitable for larger families.