Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT-A 2.0L CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT-A 2.0L CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT-A 2.0L CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱1,238,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 197 Nm @ 4250 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pick Up |
| Segment | C | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4625 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1760 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1490 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2635 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1310 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 59 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link with Stabilizer Bar | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18x7.0 | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 18x7.0 | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Operation System | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT-A 2.0L CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT-A 2.0L CVT (₱1,238,000) and the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (₱1,219,000), the choice hinges on lifestyle and priorities. The Lancer is a front-wheel-drive sedan with a naturally aspirated 2.0L gas engine (150 PS, 197 Nm) paired to a CVT, ideal for daily commuting and city driving. It offers a smooth, fuel-efficient ride, lower maintenance for gas engines, and better passenger comfort. The Ranger, a discontinued body-on-frame pickup, has a turbocharged 2.2L diesel (160 PS, 385 Nm) with a 6-speed manual, delivering exceptional torque for hauling and off-road capability. It’s ₱19,000 cheaper but is a manual, which may not suit stop-and-go traffic. The Lancer is available new, while the Ranger is discontinued (likely used market). For a family sedan or daily driver, choose the Lancer. For cargo, towing, or rugged use, opt for the Ranger if you can find a used unit. Neither is superior overall; it depends on whether you prioritize on-road comfort or utility.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT is ₱19,000 cheaper at ₱1,219,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT-A 2.0L CVT at ₱1,238,000.
Which has more power?
The Ranger produces higher torque at 385 Nm (vs. 197 Nm), while the Lancer has comparable horsepower (150 PS vs. 160 PS). For towing and hauling, the Ranger is significantly more powerful.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Lancer is better for daily commuting due to its CVT automatic transmission, lighter sedan body, and gas engine, which is more refined for city driving.
Which is more practical for cargo?
The Ranger is more practical for cargo as a pickup truck with a bed, higher torque for hauling, and a body-on-frame construction designed for heavy loads.