Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2016) Subaru ₱2,048,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Direct Injection | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 240 PS @ 5600 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm @ 2400 - 3600 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1735 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2640 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1620 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/55/R18 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55/R18 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID headlamps + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an affordable, everyday SUV with sufficient power and all‑wheel drive, the 2016 Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT is the better choice. It comes in at ₱2,048,000—₱97,000 cheaper than the 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4—and offers a higher peak power of 240 PS versus the mu‑X’s 177 PS, while still delivering a robust torque of 350 Nm. The Forester’s CVT transmission and turbo‑direct injection engine provide smooth acceleration suitable for city traffic, whereas the mu‑X’s 6‑speed automatic and diesel engine are geared more toward off‑road or heavy‑towing use. Both vehicles share a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and are available new, but the Forester’s 5‑door layout with a 2+3 seating arrangement offers slightly more flexibility for families or group travel. The mu‑X’s 4×4 drivetrain and larger 3.0‑liter inline‑4 engine make it a stronger candidate for rugged terrain or commercial use, but its higher price and diesel fuel type may be less appealing to commuters. Overall, the Forester delivers a better balance of price, power, and everyday practicality for most Filipino drivers.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT costs ₱2,048,000, while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 costs ₱2,145,000, making the Forester cheaper by ₱97,000.
Which has more power?
The Forester’s 1998cc flat‑4 engine produces 240 PS at 5600 rpm, compared to the mu‑X’s 2999cc inline‑4 engine that produces 177 PS at 3550–3650 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Forester’s CVT transmission, turbo‑direct injection engine, and 5‑door layout make it more suitable for daily commuting in urban settings.
Which is better for off‑road or heavy use?
The mu‑X’s 4WD drivetrain, larger displacement diesel engine, and 6‑speed automatic transmission make it more suitable for off‑road or heavy‑towing applications.