Subaru Forester 2.0i-L CVT (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Subaru Forester 2.0i-L CVT (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Subaru Forester 2.0i-L CVT (2016) Subaru ₱1,548,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1995cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 6200 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 198 Nm @ 4200 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1735 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2640 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1492 | 2076 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 225/60/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/60/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID headlamps + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Subaru Forester 2.0i-L CVT (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
The Subaru Forester 2.0i-L CVT (2016) and Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) serve completely different purposes despite similar price points (₱1,548,000 vs ₱1,570,000). The Forester is a compact gasoline SUV with 150 PS, 198 Nm, CVT, and AWD—ideal for daily commuting, light off-roading, and families who prioritize comfort, safety, and maneuverability. Its unibody construction and 5-seat layout suit urban driving. The Urvan is a diesel van with 129 PS and a massive 356 Nm torque from 1400 rpm, paired with a 5-speed manual and body-on-frame chassis—built for heavy cargo or passenger transport, with lower maintenance costs for commercial use. Key differences: the Forester has more horsepower but less torque, while the Urvan excels in pulling power and fuel economy (diesel vs gas). If you need a versatile daily driver with AWD, choose the Forester. If you need a workhorse for hauling goods or people, the Urvan is better. The Urvan is also two years newer (2018 vs 2016), which may affect resale value. Consider your primary use: personal vs commercial.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Subaru Forester 2.0i-L CVT (2016) is ₱1,548,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) is ₱1,570,000. The Forester is ₱22,000 cheaper.
Which is more powerful?
The Forester has higher horsepower (150 PS vs 129 PS), but the Urvan has significantly more torque (356 Nm vs 198 Nm). The Urvan's turbo diesel provides stronger low-end pulling power.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Subaru Forester is better for daily commuting due to its CVT automatic transmission, AWD for wet roads, and compact SUV size suited for city driving. The Urvan's manual transmission and larger van body are less convenient for urban traffic.
Which has better fuel economy?
The data does not provide specific fuel consumption figures. However, the Urvan's diesel engine typically offers better highway fuel economy than the Forester's gasoline engine, while the Forester may be more efficient in city driving due to its lighter weight and CVT.