Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱868,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Pick Up |
| Segment | M | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 1716 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 16'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 16'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 215/70 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 215/70 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (₱865,000) and the 2017 Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (₱868,000) hinges on lifestyle needs. The Ertiga is a 7-seater MPV ideal for families needing efficient daily transport, with a smaller 1.4L gas engine (96 PS, 130 Nm) and a 4-speed automatic transmission for ease in traffic. Its compact size (4265mm) makes it maneuverable in city streets. In contrast, the Ranger is a 5-seater pickup truck built for work or off-road use, with a larger 2.2L turbo diesel (120 PS, 285 Nm) and a 5-speed manual transmission, offering superior torque for hauling or towing. It is significantly longer (5277mm) and wider (2163mm), making it less practical for tight urban parking. Both have similar 3-year/100,000km warranties. The Ertiga costs ₱3,000 less and is better for families or daily commuting, while the Ranger is for those needing a rugged workhorse with diesel power and manual control.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT is cheaper at ₱865,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Base at ₱868,000, a difference of ₱3,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has higher power (120 PS vs 96 PS) and significantly more torque (285 Nm vs 130 Nm), making it stronger for hauling and towing.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Ertiga is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, smaller size for city driving, and lower fuel consumption from a gas engine.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Suzuki Ertiga seats 7 (2+2+3), while the Ford Ranger seats only 5 (2+3), so the Ertiga is better for larger families.