Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018) Kia ₱635,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 1248cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Natural aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 84 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 122 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 3595 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1595 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 1485 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2400 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | 913 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer + Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle + Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/55 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/55 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GL AT and the 2018 Kia Picanto 1.2 MT, price, space, power, and practicality are the decisive factors. The Ertiga is priced at ₱865,000 while the Picanto costs ₱635,000, giving the latter a ₱230,000 price advantage. However, the Ertiga offers a larger 1373 cc engine producing 96 PS at 6000 rpm and 130 Nm torque, compared to the Picanto’s 1248 cc engine with 84 PS and 122 Nm. The higher power and torque of the Ertiga translate into better acceleration and suitability for heavier loads or longer trips. In terms of practicality, the Ertiga’s MPV body and 2+2+3 seating configuration accommodate up to seven passengers, whereas the Picanto’s hatchback layout seats only five. The Ertiga also features a 4‑speed automatic transmission, which may be preferable for city driving and less manual effort. Both vehicles share a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty, FWD layout, and unibody construction. If budget is the primary concern and you need a compact car for two to three occupants, the Picanto is the clear choice. If you require more seating capacity and power for family or occasional cargo, and can afford the higher price, the Ertiga is the better option. Ultimately, choose based on whether you prioritize cost and compactness or space and performance.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Kia Picanto 1.2 MT costs ₱635,000, while the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT is priced at ₱865,000.
Which has more power?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT produces 96 PS at 6000 rpm, higher than the Kia Picanto’s 84 PS.
Which is better for family seating?
The Ertiga seats 2+2+3 (seven people), whereas the Picanto seats only 2+3 (five people).
Do both vehicles share warranty terms?
Yes, both offer a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty.