Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023) Foton ₱880,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 2156cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 87 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 220 Nm @ 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | Manual |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Van |
| Segment | M | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4705 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 2028 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2400 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | 1560 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 175/70R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 175/70R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GL AT and the 2023 Foton Harabas TM300 F‑Van, the choice hinges on intended use. The Ertiga, priced at ₱865,000, is a seven‑seat MPV with a 1.4 L inline‑4 gasoline engine delivering 96 PS and 130 Nm, paired to a 4‑speed automatic. Its unibody construction, front‑wheel drive and 5‑door layout make it suited for family outings, city commuting and occasional weekend trips, offering more passenger capacity (2+2+3) and the convenience of an automatic transmission. The Harabas, at ₱880,000, is a three‑seat, body‑on‑frame van built for cargo or light‑commercial work. Its larger 2.2 L diesel engine produces 87 PS but a higher 220 Nm torque at low rpm, ideal for hauling loads, while the manual transmission and rear‑wheel drive give better control under load. However, it only seats three and has three doors, limiting passenger use. If you need a versatile family vehicle with automatic ease, the Ertiga is the better fit. If your priority is payload, low‑end torque and a rugged platform for business use, the Harabas is the logical pick, despite the slightly higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT is priced at ₱865,000, which is ₱15,000 less than the Foton Harabas TM300 F‑Van at ₱880,000.
Which has more power?
The Ertiga’s 1.4 L gasoline engine produces 96 PS, while the Harabas’s 2.2 L diesel makes 87 PS, so the Ertiga is more powerful in peak horsepower.
Which offers higher torque for hauling?
The Harabas delivers 220 Nm of torque at 2000 rpm, compared to the Ertiga’s 130 Nm at 4000 rpm, giving the van superior low‑end pulling power.
Which is better for daily commuting with a family?
The Ertiga, with its seven‑seat layout, automatic transmission, front‑wheel drive and compact MPV size, is more suitable for daily family commuting than the three‑seat, manual, rear‑wheel‑drive Harabas.