Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Foton Harabas TM300 Wing Van (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Foton Harabas TM300 Wing Van (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Foton Harabas TM300 Wing Van (2023) Foton ₱905,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 2156cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 87 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 220 Nm @ 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | Manual |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Van |
| Segment | M | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4705 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 2028 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2400 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | 1560 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185R14Lt |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185R14LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Foton Harabas TM300 Wing Van (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between these two vehicles depends entirely on intended use. The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) is a 7-seater MPV ideal for families, with a higher 96 PS gasoline engine and automatic transmission for easier city driving. It costs ₱865,000, has a 3-year/100,000 km warranty, and seats up to 7 people. In contrast, the Foton Harabas TM300 Wing Van (2023) is a 2-seater cargo van with a diesel engine (87 PS, 220 Nm torque) and manual transmission, suited for hauling goods. It is more expensive at ₱905,000 but offers a longer 5-year/150,000 km warranty and a body-on-frame construction for durability. The Ertiga has more power and passenger capacity, while the Foton has superior torque and fuel efficiency for heavy loads. If you need a family car for daily commuting and weekend trips, get the Ertiga. If you run a small business and need a reliable workhorse, choose the Harabas. There is no one-size-fits-all answer here.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) is cheaper at ₱865,000 compared to the Foton Harabas TM300 Wing Van at ₱905,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Suzuki Ertiga has higher power output at 96 PS, while the Foton Harabas produces 87 PS, but the Foton has significantly higher torque (220 Nm vs 130 Nm) for better pulling power.
Which vehicle has a better warranty?
The Foton Harabas offers a longer warranty of 5 years or 150,000 km, while the Suzuki Ertiga has 3 years or 100,000 km.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Ertiga is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, higher passenger capacity, and gasoline engine suited for city driving. The Foton Harabas is a manual van with only two seats, designed for cargo rather than passenger transport.