Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Honda Brio 1.2 RS Black Top CVT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Honda Brio 1.2 RS Black Top CVT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 | Honda Brio 1.2 RS Black Top CVT (2024) Honda ₱863,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 1199cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Fuel Injection | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm | 90 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 110 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | Hatchback |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 3811 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1682 |
| Height (mm) | 1985 | 1487 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2405 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1185 | 969 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 35 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Electric Lime Metallic, Stellar Diamond Pearl, Meteoroid Gray Metallic, Phoenix Orange Pearl |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/55/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/55/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) vs Honda Brio 1.2 RS Black Top CVT (2024): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers deciding between the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) at ₱865,000 and the Honda Brio 1.2 RS Black Top CVT (2024) at ₱863,000, the choice boils down to passenger capacity versus modern features. The Ertiga is a 7-seater MPV with a larger 1,373cc engine producing 96 PS and 130 Nm, paired with a 4-speed automatic – ideal for families needing extra seats and space. However, it is a 2016 model, so it lacks the latest technology and design. The Brio, on the other hand, is a 2024 hatchback with a smaller 1,199cc engine (90 PS, 110 Nm) but a more efficient CVT, better for fuel economy and urban driving. It seats only 5 but comes with modern styling and a newer year model. At almost the same price, if you absolutely need seven seats, the Ertiga is your only option in this price range. But if you prioritize modernity, efficiency, and a more agile city car, the Brio is the better buy. Both have the same 3-year/100,000-km warranty.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) and the Honda Brio 1.2 RS Black Top CVT (2024)?
The Honda Brio is slightly cheaper at ₱863,000 compared to the Suzuki Ertiga at ₱865,000, a difference of only ₱2,000.
Which car has more power and torque?
The Suzuki Ertiga has higher output with 96 PS and 130 Nm, while the Honda Brio produces 90 PS and 110 Nm.
Which is better for a family with many passengers?
The Suzuki Ertiga, being a 7-seater MPV (2+2+3 seating), is clearly better for larger families. The Honda Brio seats only 5.
Which vehicle is more fuel-efficient for daily commuting?
The Honda Brio with its smaller 1,199cc engine and CVT is likely more fuel-efficient than the older 1,373cc engine and 4-speed automatic of the Ertiga, making it better for daily city commuting.