Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L HEV (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L HEV (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) Toyota ₱1,778,000 | Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L HEV (2024) Mazda ₱1,790,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2393cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VN Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 147 PS @ 3400 rpm | 164 PS |
| Max Torque | 400 Nm @ 1600-2000 rpm | 213 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Segment | J | Hatchback |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4460 |
| Width (mm) | 1855 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1835 | 1440 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2745 | 2725 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1795 | 1368 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 51 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, Coil Springs | Torsion beam |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/45R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/45R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L HEV (2024): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers weighing the 2016 Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT against the 2024 Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L HEV, the decision hinges on purpose and budget. The Fortuner, priced at ₱1,778,000, offers a diesel engine with 147 PS and an impressive 400 Nm torque, ideal for heavy-duty use such as off‑road or family trips that require robust pulling power. Its body‑on‑frame construction, RWD drivetrain, and 2+3+2 seating configuration provide extra space for passengers or cargo, making it a practical choice for larger families or those who need to haul gear. However, its older model year and limited availability mean it may lack the latest safety or infotainment features. Conversely, the Mazda 3 Fastback, priced slightly higher at ₱1,790,000, delivers a modern hybrid powertrain with 164 PS and 213 Nm torque, better suited for urban commuting and fuel‑efficient daily driving. Its FWD layout, unibody construction, and hatchback body type offer nimble handling and a compact footprint, while the 2+3 seating keeps it versatile for small groups. The Fastback’s newer technology, such as the hybrid system and contemporary design, may appeal to buyers prioritizing efficiency and modern aesthetics. In summary, choose the Fortuner if you need a rugged, spacious SUV for heavy usage; opt for the Mazda 3 Fastback if you value fuel economy, modern features, and city‑friendly handling.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Fortuner costs ₱1,778,000 while the Mazda 3 Fastback is priced at ₱1,790,000, so the Fortuner is slightly cheaper.
Which has more power?
The Mazda 3 Fastback produces 164 PS, slightly higher than the Fortuner’s 147 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 3 Fastback’s hybrid engine, FWD drivetrain, and hatchback design make it more fuel‑efficient and maneuverable for city driving.
Which offers better practicality?
The Fortuner’s 2+3+2 seating and body‑on‑frame build provide more cargo space, while the Mazda 3’s 2+3 seating fits smaller groups and offers a compact footprint.