Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) Toyota ₱1,793,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2393cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VN Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 147 PS @ 3400 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 400 Nm @ 1600-2000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1855 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1835 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2745 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1795 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, Coil Springs | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the 2016 Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4x2 AT and the 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT hinges on priorities. The Fortuner is cheaper at ₱1,793,000 vs. ₱1,845,000, but it's a 2016 model with lower power (147 PS vs. 177 PS) and torque (400 Nm vs. 380 Nm, though peak torque comes earlier). The mu-X offers a newer model year, more power, and slightly more length (4825 mm vs. 4795 mm) and width (1860 mm vs. not specified for Fortuner). However, the Fortuner has a 7-seat configuration (2+3+2) while the mu-X seats 5 (2+3), making the Fortuner better for larger families. Both have 6-speed AT, RWD, diesel engines, and similar warranties. The mu-X is currently available, while the Fortuner is not. For daily commuting, the mu-X's higher power and newer tech may be preferable, but the Fortuner's lower price and extra seats appeal to budget-conscious buyers needing more passenger capacity. Ultimately, if availability and power matter, choose the mu-X; if saving money and seating seven is key, the Fortuner (if found used) is the better value.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Toyota Fortuner is cheaper at ₱1,793,000 compared to the Isuzu mu-X at ₱1,845,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu mu-X is more powerful with 177 PS and 380 Nm torque, versus the Fortuner's 147 PS and 400 Nm torque.
Which has more seats?
The Toyota Fortuner seats 7 (2+3+2), while the Isuzu mu-X seats 5 (2+3).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X, with higher power and newer model year (2018 vs. 2016), is likely better for daily commuting, though the Fortuner's earlier torque peak may offer good low-end response.